The Coase theorem and the NFL Network

As you are probably aware, there is a big time football game between the Green Bay Packers and the Dallas Cowboys being played tonight (Thursday), but most of the country can't see it because it is only on the NFL Network. The network is in a stalemate with the large cable companies about pricing. In short, the NFL Network charges a certain price ( about $.70 per subscriber) to the cable companies for the right to air the programming. The cable companies argue that this price is too high for a single network and want the NFL package as part of a sports tier with a premium price.

So here is where the Coase theorem comes into play. There should be a price at which the NFL Network is happy to be a part of the premium sports tier (perhaps $1.00 per subscriber). If this is the case, then an efficient solution is for the other channels on the premium tier (NBA TV, Fox Sports, etc) to make up the difference between the current asking price and the strike price. This is efficient as long as the NFL Network is as big of an attraction as the NFL says it is. The NFL argues that they are the biggest sports draw in the country. The other sports leagues and events would benefit from the additional subscribers that would accompany the NFL on the premium tier and this is worth compensation.
Yet these negotiations are not happening, nor will they. Can this be completely blamed on transaction costs? Maybe, but there are not that many other networks that need to be included in negotiations. Does the NFL Network's asking price lead to an inefficient solution? Probably, as most people don't get it and the other networks are not well served by a smaller subscription base. Perhaps there is no price at which the NFL Network is willing to be on a premium tier.

So what are the transaction costs here, and is there any other reason that this situation has not been resolved?

The subprime meltdown is bad for surfers

Apparently the waves have been particularly tasty in SoCal (I haven't paddled out in quite a while), but they are also packed all day, every day. Surfline, a surfing website, went to find out who all the surfers were in the line up on a recent weekday afternoon in Orange County. Not surprisingly, most people they talked to were in the surf business or worked evenings. But a few were out of work mortgage bankers and other self employed folks having bad years (realtors?)
So the subprime meltdown is bad for Americans, bad for Wall Street, and bad for surfing. Just when you think it couldn't get worse...
http://www.surfline.com/surfnews/article_bamp.cfm?id=12172

The photo on the left is of us as we reached the lake created by the glaciers. There are two galciers meeting to form the tounge behind us. We had hiked about three and a half hours to get to this lake, but the hike was relatively flat and easy. The photo on the right is us sitting on the glacier, more or less straight behind our location in the first photo. We had just scaled the ice wall (Megan led the way by being the first up to the top). Getting from the location on the left to the location on the right was grueling, however, as it required hiking up and down steep slopes of large, wet or loose rocks. It took about two and a half hours to get from the first photo to the second.

Ice climbing on the Torre Glacier

Here's Dave scaling the icy mountain. Here you can see the actual height of the climb.

Photos from Argentina

Here's Megan at the summit of the icy mountain the mean guides made her climb.

Dave and Megan go to Argentina

Megan and I are going to Argentina, where we will hike on glaciers. I have no idea what to wear, but I doubt that the glaciers are any colder than Minneapolis during the third week of January.